Yesterday, Jason Calacanis mused on ' Why doreally smart people hate Plaxo so much?', while blogging from PC Forum. And… Plaxo's Privacy Officer, Stacy Martin,responds and comments extensively onJason's post below. A cursory search of Feedsterreveals that Stacy Martin has been busily responding to additional' Death to Plaxo' threats [this citation byBret Fausett] as well.
Back on December 13, 2003, Icreated a post [ Plaxo Evil?] on my 'knowledge notes' weblog ruminating about David Coursey's assertions that Plaxo is indeed evil. That post still receives an inordinate number ofhits. [Google search today for' Plaxo'.]
While Plaxo has a 'viral' nature, if as Stacy Martin asserts Plaxo has a sterling privacy policy, then do we stillhate Plaxo as much? The bulk of collective Plaxo-loathing is around the continual spam-like barrage of requests to addour contact details to each and every friend's Plaxo database would we loathe it less sans those requests?
How is the Plaxo spam phenomenon different than the continual stream of requests we receive to join YASNS? Many ofus are potentially sharing even more 'intimate' data than Plaxo inquiries request on Eurekster, Friendster, Friendzy,LinkedIn, Orkut, Spoke, and/or Tribe. Are these services any more or less private? Or any more or less annoying to haveto re-load and re-configure our personal details over and over again on each service?
What would Plaxo have to do to gain our trust and stop feeling so much like spam and stop generating press like Get thee behind me, Plaxo [The Inquirer; Wendy Grossman] andthe David Coursey article I cited at the beginning of this post.
There is a paper by Roger Clark part of a series on PITs [privacy invasive technologies] and PETs [privacyenhancing technologies] titled Very Black'Little Black Books ' that addresses some of these issues regarding Plaxo and otheraddress-book services, and YASNS.













